"; } else { echo "";}> Malt & Barley Chronicles: June 2006 Archives

June 2006 Archives

The package says the name comes from the "hopback kettle" used at the end of the brewing process.  I think it comes from the reaction from one's first taste -- hopping back at the bitter shock crushing the tongue.

Characteristics: Warm amber color, hoppy from start to finish, medium body, slightly fizzy, slightly smoky and caramel flavors buried deep in the hops.

Gripes: Did I mention the hops yet?

Bottom Line: I like American pale ales from time to time, but Sierra Nevada on steroids is a bit much. Disguising the beer with the "amber" descriptor instead of "IPA" doesn't help -- any points earned for not claiming "India" are immediately conceded by omitting "pale."

Rating: 4.75 / 10

Technorati: , , , ,

It's now summer here in Washington, DC... and that means it's really far too hot and muggy to be drinking heavier beers.  (DC is a pilsener town in the summer -- crisp and ice cold are the orders of the day.)  So I'm going out with a bang -- one of the most complex beers I've ever tasted.

Characteristics: Dark burnt brown color, medium to heavy body, rich toasted bitter finish over a swirling middle of baking chocolate and coffee, and a little bite or crispness delivered through subtle carbonation.

Minor Gripes: The richness can be overwhelming.  My first one was a real shock to the system -- perhaps because I drank it straight from the bottle and didn't give it any time to breathe.

Bottom Line: Once it's porter season in your neck of the woods, definitely seek out a six pack of this lovely beer.  I'm not sure why this beer doesn't qualify for the "Wolaver's" name (reserved for certified organics), but it's a winner.

Rating: 7.25 / 10

Technorati: , , , ,

I'm not going to get into the great debate on whether this beverage is a lambic, a gueuze, or something in between... the New York Times already tackled that one (free reg.) in a recent diversion from its Wines of the Times series.  Let's just focus on the beverage on its own terms.

Characteristics: Rich red cloudy color, high carbonation, thin body, sweetness permeates every sip with only a hint of natural raspberry tang in the finish as it warms up from the refrigerator.

Gripes: Far too sweet -- a dry raspberry would be far more drinkable.

Bottom Line: Even as a special treat, the Lindeman's Framboise just doesn't work unless you want something closer to a champagne cocktail.  If you're intrigued by the idea of a beer in fluted stemware, go for the cherry (and perhaps away from the Lindeman's entirely).

Rating: 4.5 / 10

Technorati: , , , ,

Anti-Spam

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from June 2006 listed from newest to oldest.

May 2006 is the previous archive.

July 2006 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.